AGM Provides 28 Lighted Signs for St. Simons Island Airport Upgrade

As featured in Airport Improvement Magazine, the environmentally-friendly runway resurfacing project also included new energy-efficient signs from AGM.


Read full article...

Cold In-Place Pavement Recycling Saves Money & Appeals to Community at St. Simons Island

Facts and Figures

Project: Resurfacing Secondary Runway

Location: McKinnon St. Simons Island (GA) Airport

Cost: $1.39 million

Primary Challenge: Financing, because secondary runway improvements do not qualify for Airport Improvement Program funds

Funding: GA Dept. of Transportation (75%); airport (25%)

Resurfacing Process: Cold In-Place Recycling

Project Duration: 4 months

Design, Construction Administration/Inspection: RS&H

Geotechnical & Materials Testing: Ellis & Associates

Resident Inspection Support: Roberts Civil Engineering PC

Runway Rehab: Seaboard Construction Co.

Paving: Asphalt Paving Systems

Pavement Markings: Peek Pavement Markings

Associated Projects: Taxiway improvements; new lighting & signage

FAA Funding: Nearly $442,000

New Cabling: 50,000 linear ft.

Signage/Lighting: 44 new runway lights; 112 taxiway lights; 28 lighted signs; new Precision Approach Path Indicator system; supplemental wind cone

Electrical: Trinity Electrical Services

Electrical Cabling: Draka

Lighting & Precision Approach Path Indicator: Airport Lighting Company

Signage: Airfield Guidancesign Manufacturers

Wind Cone: Hali-Brite

Sitting on a small, exclusive island off the southeast coast of Georgia, McKinnon St. Simons Island Airport (SSI) serves an upscale population of private aircraft operators. Nevertheless, the airport faced a distinct financial quandary when it needed to resurface its badly deteriorating secondary runway: such projects are not eligible for FAA Airport Improvement
Program funds.

With cost being the “driving factor” when reviewing its options, the airport decided to use cold in-place pavement recycling to resurface the 3,300-foot runway. Although the method is not often used for airports, project designer RS&H considered it the perfect solution for SSI. Recycling existing pavement materials onsite made the project affordable and environmentally friendly-welcome attributes for the surrounding community, explains Brian Thompson, a senior aviation engineer with the consulting firm.

In total, the project cost $1.39 million, with the Georgia Dept. of Transportation (GDOT) funding 75% and the airport paying for 25%.

For airport officials, keeping SSI’s secondary runway operational was more than just important; it was necessary. “Wind conditions are more critical for smaller aircraft, and being on the ocean coast, there is a higher degree of various wind conditions,” explains Robert Burr, executive director of the Glynn County Airport Commission. “It is important to have at least two runways, affording four possible landing directions.”

Fortunately, state transportation officials recognize the importance of the small, towerless facility. “With more than 90 based aircraft, SSI is one of Georgia’s busiest general aviation airports and is a vital asset within Georgia’s statewide aviation system,” says Steve Brian, GDOT’s aviation program manager. “The airport supports a variety of flight operations, including government, charter, business and general aviation, and provides a seamless connection to regional, national and global economies. Maintaining the secondary runway pavement at this airport was vital to maximize operational flexibility in a coastal environment.”

Last year, SSI logged about 43,000 flight operations, largely for tourists drawn to the area’s tony beaches, golf resorts and nature activities. Back in 2004, powerful world leaders converged on St. Simons Island for the G8 Summit.

Cost-Effective & Green
Due to wide, full-depth cracking in the pavement, RS&H engineers knew that SSI’s secondary runway needed more than just an asphalt overlay; but complete reconstruction was unaffordable and soil conditions were unsuitable for cement stabilization.

“We searched for more ideas at the request of the airport director and came across cold in-place recycling,” Thompson relates. “Vendors who did this sort of work came out to look at the site and thought the runway was a good candidate.”

Burr and other airport officials were pleased with the option. “Cold in-place recycling saves the contractor costs of removing milled material and trucking it off the island and bringing new material in,” he explains. “It also cuts down on community impact by reducing the number of trucks. The [low] impact of construction activity on the tourist destination of the island had a very favorable effect on our decision to use this process.”

The process also eliminates the need for hot asphalt. “It’s very similar to conventional asphalt, but there’s no heating; so you’re not using oil or materials to heat it,” Thompson remarks. “That means you don’t have the off-gassing that comes with it, or the smell.”

GDOT was also comfortable with the recycling method. In fact, the department had previously approved and funded the technique at four other general aviation airports in Georgia. “Although it is not our traditional method of pavement rehabilitation, it has proven to be one of the best tools in our toolbox to rehabilitate pavements with severe longitudinal and transverse cracking and prevent future reflective cracking,” says Brian.

To execute in-place recycling at SSI, pavement was milled 5 inches deep and ejected into a trailing hopper, where it was mixed it with a small amount of Portland cement and an unheated asphalt emulsion. That mixture was then fed into a paving machine, which rolled it into place to create a base course for the pavement. Machinery was connected as a single equipment train, notes Thompson.

Thompson considers cold in-place recycling a “win-win” for SSI, because it was environmentally friendly and reduced costs. “The community was concerned about the environment, and we didn’t have any problems with [opposition to the project],” he reports. “It was all good public relations.”

Time Tradeoff
The downside of cold emulsion is that crews add water to the asphalt, and it takes four or five days after paving for the water to evaporate and the material to set, Thompson explains. The process also produces a base that is “fairly coarse,” with visible chunks. At SSI, contractors installed 2 inches of conventional asphalt on top of the recycled base course to smooth out the surface.

“Instead of doing 5 inches of asphalt, we only had to do 2,” reports Thompson. “That was a huge difference.”

Advantages aside, cold in-place recycling is not appropriate for airports with traffic from heavy aircraft. The weight limit for the resulting pavement is about 16,000 pounds, advises Thompson.

The project team encountered an additional challenge at SSI when engineers found areas with sand asphalt base layers-a material used several decades ago to save money. “The problem was that when we exposed the layers, they became brittle and turned back into sand,” Thompson explains. To correct the issue, crews removed the material and replaced it with standard aggregate before proceeding with the surface layer as planned.

While We’re at It
Although the resurfacing project was originally intended to be a stand-alone endeavor, new lighting and signage was also in the improvement pipeline for SSI’s secondary runway. Originally, airport officials thought these would be separate projects; but as planning for the resurfacing effort began, it started making sense to bundle them. “We delayed the cold in-place pavement recycling project to line up with the other two projects,” Thompson recalls. “We didn’t want to close the runway one year and then again the next year. Eventually, the projects got close enough where they would only be six months apart; so we pushed back the [resurfacing] project to make them all align.”

SSI closed its secondary runway from September 2016 to January 2017 for improvements, but its 5,500-foot primary runway remained open for traffic. Taxiways were adjusted to accommodate the temporary changes.

During the airfield lighting portion of the project, contractors installed more than 50,000 linear feet (about 9.5 miles) of cabling. Other elements included 44 new runway lights, 112 taxiway lights, 28 lighted signs, a new precision approach path indicator (PAPI) lighting system and a supplemental wind cone.

“All the signage is now upgraded to current standards,” Burr reports. “It’s a vast improvement over what we had before. Prior to this, taxiways and turn-offs were not identified. Now, we have good directional signage for pilots.”

Total cost for all three projects was $2.47 million. FAA paid about $442,000 for eligible taxiway improvements, lights and signage; GDOT contributed $1.51 million; and the Glynn County Airport Commission paid nearly $525,000.

In retrospect, Burr says he is pleased with the project because it allowed the airport to continue to operate two runways at an affordable cost. “Typical funding sources were not available for this project. This was the perfect opportunity to have cost savings and operational savings with the runway only being closed for four months,” he reflects. “We were able to put back in service an excellent runway, and pilots are now very complimentary of the runway we have in place.”


Greater Binghamton Gives AGM LED Runway Signs the Nod

A side by side comparison of AGM LED signs vs. traditional incandescent fixtures convinced Greater Binghamton Airport in upstate New York of the many advantages of LED technology.

In addition to reduced cost of operation and greater efficiency, the low energy load requirements of the LED signs made them an ideal choice in the reconfiguration of the main runway and adjacent taxiways. In addition, snow country performance is an absolute must in Binghamton, where average snowfall is nearly 85 inches.

According to an article in Airport Improvement Magazine the LED signs were an integral part of a larger airport reconstruction project.

Read full article...

Greater Binghamton Gives LED Runway Signs the Nod

By Jim Faber

The difference was clear for Tom Pudish.

The airport manager at the Greater Binghamton Airport near the New York-Pennsylvania border had a chance to look at LED runway lights and signs next to traditional incandescent fixtures before outfitting the airport’s 7,000-foot parallel taxiway already under construction.

The LED lights were the clear choice, says Pudish, citing their overall cost savings for Binghamton’s particular project and clear and bright appearance compared to incandescent options.

The LED lights and signs are a small part of a larger project at the Binghamton airport. In summer 2008, the airport began a roughly $8 million multi-phase project to combine its two 75-foot-wide taxiways into one full parallel taxiway. According to senior engineer Jason Flemming of McFarland-Johnson, a horizontal shift of the taxiways was required to increase the separation between the runway and taxiway centerline to 300 feet. Reconstruction will consist of a bituminous asphalt binder and top course on a crushed aggregate base.

New York’s brutal winter weather recently suspended the project with taxiway construction about 50% complete; the balance of the work is expected to be finished in 2009. The original schedule called for completion in fall 2008, but a subcontractor installing the crushed aggregate base had difficulty meeting placement and compaction requirements, Flemming explains.

Early Adopters

The Federal Aviation Administration only recently approved LED signs for use on taxiways. In addition to the new LED signs, the project includes nearly 250 lights converted to LED and 41 new lights for part of the taxiway that is yet to be completed.

Although the $1.4 million LED signs and lights represented a higher up-front cost compared to traditional incandescent lights, Flemming says they still provided both short-term and long-term cost savings at Binghamton.

Here’s how: About two years ago, the airport performed a runway rehabilitation project, which included updated lights and signs as well as the replacement of the runway regulator. After that project, but prior to the current one, FAA signage standards changed. Current standards require runway hold short signs and runway exit signs to be placed on the runway circuit instead of the taxiway circuit. At Binghamton, 25 signs had to be moved from the taxiway circuit to runway circuit. Using conventional signs, however, would have overloaded the power capacity of the runway regulator, which was only about two years old. Because LED signs create a smaller electrical load, the runway regulator would not have to be replaced if they were used. In addition, the extra cost of LED signs was less than the cost of a new regulator – at least $40,000, according to Pudish’s estimate.